snthpy 8 hours ago

Thanks for this. Looks cool!

I see you mentioned Radicle. What are the major differences compared to Radicle? Having read just the blog post I would guess it's the source of the identity as a start, so you can use users' existing atproto did s whereas Radicle has to bootstrap a whole new identity web.

0x4FFC8F 6 hours ago

Great work guys! Haven't had a chance to look into atproto and bluesky, but now because of tangled I will.

imoverclocked 5 hours ago

How does authorization work? Is everything pull-only or can you push to someone’s knot?

  • icy 4 hours ago

    Hey, you can indeed push to someone’s knot if they’ve invited you on it. The knot server will automatically populate your ssh pubkeys (if you’ve added them) allowing you to push. :)

xnxt 4 hours ago

did you consider integrating atproto with Radicle? if no, why not?

  • nsteel an hour ago

    The second paragraph of their blog posts suggests Radicle doesn't support central identity. It's really hard to imagine one of the core concepts of Radicle bending (breaking) to allow that.

    • CGamesPlay 16 minutes ago

      Building on this, I think Radicle would be described as "peer-to-peer", whereas something like Tangled is "federated". The article differentiates Tangled from other federated systems by saying that you can use a "centralized" ID using AT Protocol, but I don't know if the ID provider itself is centralized, centralized-but-self-hostable, or federated.