sluongng 2 days ago
  • yjftsjthsd-h 2 days ago

    Nit: Probably https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/flock.1.html (shell command, not the underlying libc function)

    • anitil 2 days ago

      This was my first thought and I suppose flock(1) could be used to recreate a lot of this. But it does come with some other quality-of-life improvements like being able to list all currently-used locks, having a lock holdable by N processes etc.

  • Zacru 2 days ago

    Because that's a syscall ;) https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/flock.1.html is the command line manual.

    I would say one good reason is that

      waitlock myapp &
      JOB_PID=$!
      # ... do exclusive work ...
      kill $JOB_PID
    
    is a lot easier to use and remember than

      (; flock -n 9 || exit 1; # ... commands executed under lock ...; ) 9>/var/lock/mylockfile
    • yjftsjthsd-h 2 days ago

      Why

        (; flock -n 9
      
      and not

        ( flock -n 9
      
      ?
      • apopapo 2 days ago

        It's a "for" loop.

        • marklgr 2 days ago

          Could you elaborate?

          • apopapo 2 days ago

            A for loop in a shell script may sometimes look like this:

            `for ((i = 0 ; i < max ; i++ )); do echo "$i"; done`

            Here this is essentially a "while" loop, meaning it will keep executing the commands as long as we don't reach `exit 1`.

            (; flock -n 9 || exit 1; # ... commands executed under lock ...; )

            • yjftsjthsd-h 13 hours ago

              It doesn't seem to work?

                [~] 0 $ ( flock -n 9 || exit 1; echo in loop ; sleep 3 ; echo done working ; ) 9>~/tmp/mylock
                in loop
                done working
                [~] 0 $ (; flock -n 9 || exit 1; echo in loop ; sleep 3 ; echo done working ; ) 9>~/tmp/mylock
                -bash: syntax error near unexpected token `;'
                [~] 2 $
              
              
              (This is bash)
    • permalac 2 days ago

      Flock can be used in a single line for example for cronjobs.

      Flock -s file && script.

      Pretty simple. (I forgot the argument, I think is -s..

    • bigattichouse 2 days ago

      just pushed a change so now it's:

      waitlock myapp & #... do stuff waitlock --done myapp

  • ethan_smith 2 days ago

    flock is indeed built-in: `flock -xn /tmp/mylock.lock -c "echo running locked command"` does mutex locking in bash. Your tool might offer better ergonomics or features beyond flock's capabilities?

forrestthewoods 2 days ago

I don’t know the exact threshold at which you should use a real programming language instead of a bash script. But this type of work definitely exceeds it.

  • anitil 2 days ago

    While in general I'd agree, this isn't necessarily just for bash scripts. It could just wrap the execution of another program allowing higher-level logic to handle concurrency and the low-level program to do it's one-at-a-time job

  • bigattichouse 2 days ago

    Sometimes you have a cron job that takes longer than it should (but inconsistently so), and another cron job that clobbers what that cron job is doing.

asddfgg55 2 days ago

Useful project, I love all things terminal, so I also enjoyed your project.

  • eddythompson80 2 days ago

    You enjoyed the project because you love the terminal?

    • bigattichouse 2 days ago

      Good enough for me. I created the project because I love terminal, and wanted to make something using Claude (to learn how this tool works, strictly for personal enrichment) that solves a small problem I had with some overlapping cron job management.

      • eddythompson80 2 days ago

        I was saying that in a questioning tone implying that I think the account is a bot.